any other skiers on the board?
- overheadx2
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:08 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: huntington beach
Re: any other skiers on the board?
Dave, Like I said, I'm as new to this as you so you may be better off getting your info from some others on this site that have put a lot of time in already. That said, the set up I went with was the Fritschi Vipec Evo binding on a Voile BC supercharger ski. A little more high end than I need but at half price I could afford it.The skis I have for sale at Gear Xchange in bishop are Fritschi Freeride Pro size XL and small on community skis (local sierra company). I bought the community skis used for $200 from eastern sierra mountain guides and am trying to sell them for the same now since I didn't care for the track bindings. If you are interested in those skis you can see them there, and I'd be happy to reduce the price for you. I'm headed up there Next month and will be grabbing them if they don't sell. I can send you some pics later when I get home.
I went with the BC skis since they have scales and can go up hill with out skins so long as its less than say 20 degrees. The purist probably will have something to say about the AT bindings and the scales, but I haven't been pure in a long time and was really just trying to go hiking in the winter. The BC skis allow you to tour without taking skins on and off all the time. Phil
I went with the BC skis since they have scales and can go up hill with out skins so long as its less than say 20 degrees. The purist probably will have something to say about the AT bindings and the scales, but I haven't been pure in a long time and was really just trying to go hiking in the winter. The BC skis allow you to tour without taking skins on and off all the time. Phil
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- DAVELA
- Topix Regular
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:23 am
- Experience: N/A
- Location: los angeles
Re: any other skiers on the board?
Thanks Phil...if in bishop ill check em out...i guess i dont know the difference between bc and AT...im not interested in downhill blasting or mogul skiing just climbing up and sliding down leisurely.I find the trek back with snowshoes a bit tedious/slow-would be so nice to just glide back to the car!
http://www.suwa.org/protect-greater-canyonlands" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- overheadx2
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:08 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: huntington beach
Re: any other skiers on the board?
Davela, I feel your pain since there is no where close to us to look at XC skis and bindings. You are always welcome to come by and take a look at my set up, and even borrow my 2 year old BC NNN set up so long as you can fit into a size 13 boot. I used my 80 mm BC skis last year with BC nnn bindings and realized that was not going to work on any thing more than fire roads or groomed tracks. After using those for a season, I realized I needed to significantly upgrade, and I'm glad I did. This season with my new set up, I was able to hike almost any where i wanted and ski down easily.
The way I have it figured (I may be off a little since I am only one step ahead of you) is that most Back country xc skis are just regular powder skis with either tele/three pin, track and AT bindings on them. Skis with a BC in the name means that they have scales. This allows for up hill traction to about 20 degrees without putting on skins. Xc skis with out the BC in the name are just normal powder skis with out scales. For example Voile makes a supercharger ski as well as a supercharger BC.
Here's what i think i know about bindings. Tele / three pin are nice for touring since the boots seem to be a little more comfy, but very little to no boot release ability. Going down hill on those bindings is a whole new animal and needs to be learned. Track bindings are basically regular ski bindings that are hinged for walking. When you ski down hill, you simply lock the whole binding in place, lock your boot flex and ski like your on a regular hill. They are great for down hill since the release mechanism is the same as a regular binding. The down side is they are heavy and clack a lot as you walk. AT bindings are extremely light and have 2 pins on either side of the toe and your boot is hinged from that attachment. There is another piece at the heal that can lock your heal into place when you go down hill similar to a regular down hill binding. The problem has been the lack of boot release. The new ones that I just bought now have a relatively good release mechanism, but not as good as a track binding. Others can chime in and correct any mis inf that Ive put out there. Phil
The way I have it figured (I may be off a little since I am only one step ahead of you) is that most Back country xc skis are just regular powder skis with either tele/three pin, track and AT bindings on them. Skis with a BC in the name means that they have scales. This allows for up hill traction to about 20 degrees without putting on skins. Xc skis with out the BC in the name are just normal powder skis with out scales. For example Voile makes a supercharger ski as well as a supercharger BC.
Here's what i think i know about bindings. Tele / three pin are nice for touring since the boots seem to be a little more comfy, but very little to no boot release ability. Going down hill on those bindings is a whole new animal and needs to be learned. Track bindings are basically regular ski bindings that are hinged for walking. When you ski down hill, you simply lock the whole binding in place, lock your boot flex and ski like your on a regular hill. They are great for down hill since the release mechanism is the same as a regular binding. The down side is they are heavy and clack a lot as you walk. AT bindings are extremely light and have 2 pins on either side of the toe and your boot is hinged from that attachment. There is another piece at the heal that can lock your heal into place when you go down hill similar to a regular down hill binding. The problem has been the lack of boot release. The new ones that I just bought now have a relatively good release mechanism, but not as good as a track binding. Others can chime in and correct any mis inf that Ive put out there. Phil
- DAVELA
- Topix Regular
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:23 am
- Experience: N/A
- Location: los angeles
Re: any other skiers on the board?
Thanks Phil!Yes i think its the AT with2 pin setup that i want.I also dont want clacking noises which i kind of get when going back down on snowshoes.I rentedy xc skis from eastside last year and it was beautiful going uphill and a disaster going down.
There always drawbacks to whatever system you choose so i have to consider that.With snowshoes i can go anywhere,no planned route per se.With skis i think you have to sort of know in advance what terrain you ll be facing and whether its doable...i digress.In january i went up to blue lake from sabrina basin and no way i could ve done with the route i did.
There always drawbacks to whatever system you choose so i have to consider that.With snowshoes i can go anywhere,no planned route per se.With skis i think you have to sort of know in advance what terrain you ll be facing and whether its doable...i digress.In january i went up to blue lake from sabrina basin and no way i could ve done with the route i did.
http://www.suwa.org/protect-greater-canyonlands" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- alpinemike
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:00 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Reno, NV
- Contact:
Re: any other skiers on the board?
Yes Phil you got that all right. I did a lot of research on this subject and am very happy with my set up. My skis are not scaled since I use them at the resort. They are also on the heavier side for a true AT ski. Eventually I will get a lighter scaled ski for more serious touring.
I used a frame style binding and knew it was way too heavy so I went to the 2 pin Tech style binding. You refer to that as an AT binding, but I would say the proper term is Tech AT binding. That way there's no confusion between frame style AT bindings and Tech style ones. The Tech style is the only way to go and all of the new bindings ski incredibly well downhill and have release values that are certified. They have come a long way since the originals. I honestly could feel no difference skiing downhill on my tech bindings versus a traditional alpine binding.
I used a frame style binding and knew it was way too heavy so I went to the 2 pin Tech style binding. You refer to that as an AT binding, but I would say the proper term is Tech AT binding. That way there's no confusion between frame style AT bindings and Tech style ones. The Tech style is the only way to go and all of the new bindings ski incredibly well downhill and have release values that are certified. They have come a long way since the originals. I honestly could feel no difference skiing downhill on my tech bindings versus a traditional alpine binding.
Never put off a backpacking trip for tomorrow, if you can do it today...
Alpine Mike-
http://mikhailkorotkinphotography.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Alpine Mike-
http://mikhailkorotkinphotography.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Topix Fanatic
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 11:16 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Re: any other skiers on the board?
Slo pitch softball - the most social sport
Surfing - the most competitive sport. If you don't win (you catching this wave instead of several other stronger paddlers than you) you aren't allowed to participate (catch the wave). Don't win, don't play.
Golf - the most frustrating sport.
Backpacking -the hardest work sport with a great reward (fishing and your memories).
Peak bagging, JMT bagging, PCT bagging - the most impressive. (Why else would anyone do something that is so physically and mentally difficult and not get paid money)? PS: I'm not very materialistic.
Cross country skiing - just hard work. Nothing else (maybe chest beating).
Downhill skiing - playing. Just plain playing and pleasure and fun. Lots of people have trouble with fun.
If you need to prove something, downhill skiing might not be for you. It's only fun, nothing else.
I believe these, but let it be said that most of what I write is just entertaining myself and obviously my opinion.
Surfing - the most competitive sport. If you don't win (you catching this wave instead of several other stronger paddlers than you) you aren't allowed to participate (catch the wave). Don't win, don't play.
Golf - the most frustrating sport.
Backpacking -the hardest work sport with a great reward (fishing and your memories).
Peak bagging, JMT bagging, PCT bagging - the most impressive. (Why else would anyone do something that is so physically and mentally difficult and not get paid money)? PS: I'm not very materialistic.
Cross country skiing - just hard work. Nothing else (maybe chest beating).
Downhill skiing - playing. Just plain playing and pleasure and fun. Lots of people have trouble with fun.
If you need to prove something, downhill skiing might not be for you. It's only fun, nothing else.
I believe these, but let it be said that most of what I write is just entertaining myself and obviously my opinion.
- overheadx2
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:08 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: huntington beach
Re: any other skiers on the board?
Thanks for the correction Mike. What I have are tech bindings. I took my BC skis to a local hill to try them out on some down hill before getting out in the wilderness. To be honest, I didn't notice much of a difference between them and my regular powder ski. They may have been slightly slower, but there different seem to be any difference in the edges.
Dave, don't be discouraged by the regular XC NNN skis. I am a pretty good skier, and couldn't control those things downhill to save my life. The AT set up is just like regular skis and I'm pretty sure if I could do it on shoes, I could do it on AT skis. If you get a chance, head to Mammoth Mountaineering and rent a set of AT skis.
Dave, don't be discouraged by the regular XC NNN skis. I am a pretty good skier, and couldn't control those things downhill to save my life. The AT set up is just like regular skis and I'm pretty sure if I could do it on shoes, I could do it on AT skis. If you get a chance, head to Mammoth Mountaineering and rent a set of AT skis.
- SSSdave
- Topix Addict
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:18 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Silicon Valley
- Contact:
Re: any other skiers on the board?
![Image](http://www.davidsenesac.com/Skiing/SaddleBowl2.jpg)
Disgustingly dry start to winter so far but such has tended to be the new status quo this last decade plus. Now into November, our 2018/2019 winter season will begin when the jetstream stuck far to the north moves back south. I've already had Vail A ding my bank account for another Epic senior Tahoe Local Value Pass so again will be skiing Kirkwood, Heavenly, and Northstar.
Late last season bought some Daymaker bindings that are sort of like the old Alpine Trekkers. Tried them out one day up at Sonora Pass. Allows wearing alpine ski boots into normal ski bindings in a free heel mode for climbing up modest gradient slopes. Hope to do some powder skiing videos on some wide open slopes I've surveyed in the Carson Pass area.
![Image](http://www.davidsenesac.com/Skiing/LittleDipper_2718c.jpg)
Last winter given pass access to 3 resorts, changed my focus from years of mostly Kirkwood to Heavenly because the rec mogul skiing on Little Dipper is better than anywhere else is the region and there are many more bump skiers on those slopes on any given day that is important for keeping loose packed powder snow surfaces. I'm also able to get more untracked fresh powder runs in there midweek because there are large expanses of tree runs that the more obscure of which are slower to get tracked up. In any case will get good numbers of days in at KW too.
FYI, the best skiing enthusiast board is on below link and it does have a backcountry skiing sub-forum now. Far more posting activity each day than on hiking or backpacking boards:
https://www.pugski.com
- rightstar76
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:22 pm
- Experience: N/A
Re: any other skiers on the board?
.
Last edited by rightstar76 on Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
- DAVELA
- Topix Regular
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:23 am
- Experience: N/A
- Location: los angeles
Re: any other skiers on the board?
I am getting more sunburned driving in my car in Nov than I did all summer!I saw the smoke plume over Malibu from Venice last Thursday morning and can't believe how it exploded so big in a few hours.
Possible precip is forecast here in LA for next week.Hope the Sierra gets hit.Maybe a road trip over turkey weekend.
Forgot all about AT skis over the summer!
Possible precip is forecast here in LA for next week.Hope the Sierra gets hit.Maybe a road trip over turkey weekend.
Forgot all about AT skis over the summer!
http://www.suwa.org/protect-greater-canyonlands" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest